Proposal of variables, dimensions and indicators to evaluate impact on sports specialties
Main Article Content
Abstract
Despite there being more than twenty years of experience in the implementation of some 29 sports specialty programs and achieving the graduation of 904 specialists, there are no evaluations of the quality of said programs or instruments on how to do it. The objective of the work is to develop variables, dimensions and indicators for the evaluation of the impact of postgraduate specialty programs in high-performance sports of the Cuban sports system. Empirical level investigative methods such as documentary analysis, survey, group interview and expert judgment are combined with other theoretical level methods to build a logical relationship in response to the object of inquiry. Inadequacies and potential for improvement are revealed, and indicators tempered with the activity are conceived that allow measuring the impact of postgraduate specialties for high-performance sports in Cuba.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Those authors who have publications with this journal, accept the following terms of the license Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0):
You are free to:
Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation.
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
References
Briones, G. (1991). Evaluación de Programas Sociales. México: Editorial Trillas.
Betacur, S. (2012). Enfermera Docente Departamento de Salud Pública. Facultad de Ciencias para la Salud. Universidad de Caldas.
Cazau, P. (2006). Introducción a la Investigación en Ciencias Sociales. http://www.galeon.com/pcazau
Campistrous, L., y Rizo, C. (2006). Indicadores e investigación educativa. En Metodología de la investigación educacional. Desafíos y polémicas actuales. Ciudad de La Habana, Cuba: Editorial Ciencias Médicas.
Díaz Rojas, PA (2015). Evaluación del impacto de la maestría en educación médica sobre sus egresado [Tesis doctoral en Ciencias de la salud ]Universidad de Ciencias Médicas. Universidad de Holguín. Repositorio de tesis en Ciencias Biomédicas y de la Salud institucional https://tesis.sld.cu/index.php?P=FullRecord&ID=407
Fleitas, I., Mesa, M., y Guardo, M. (2013). Sobre algunos métodos cualimétricos en la Cultura Física: criterio de expertos, especialistas, peritos, jueces y árbitros, usuarios y evaluadores externos. Revista Efdeportes. https://www.efdeportes.com/efd179/metodos-cualimetricos-en-la-cultura-fisica.htm
Fuentes, H (2008) Modelo de gestión didáctica del posgrado a distancia Repositorio Universidad de Oriente.
https://tesis.sld.cu/index.php/index.php?P=DownloadFile&Id=568
MES. (2015). Sistema de Evaluación y Acreditación de Especialidades de Posgrado (SEA-EP). La Habana, Cuba.https://instituciones.sld.cu/cedas/files/2016/06/5.pdf